ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
They'll think God left the museum for good.
Okay so that line means something completely different in the song than in this journal but I feel like it is fitting. It can make you scared, but only if you want it to.
Censorship continues to creep in at the edges, it seems to be slowly and aimed mostly only at visual art, I say mostly because several of you have had written works targeted as well. I have noticed that it started with photo-manip. folks, and then spread to DID creators, and now all the way to an amazing artist who I have featured several times who creates beautiful works.
Here are his thoughts and where the subsequent discussion is at present.
This beautiful shot got him a note suggesting that he remove the image, not telling, just suggesting. So it starts out with a little old fashioned melodramatic suggestive threat, and therefore from a place of very tenuous moral standing in my opinion. I believe it was handled thus because when one looks at it, you can see how it could be interpreted that the lady is touching herself erotically, or is covering herself, she could be stifling a yawn, or a cry of ecstasy.
It is all open to interpretation, which is inherently clever on the part of both model and photographer, and that is literally what makes it art and not porn. Porn is brazen and clear and gratuitous, whereas art is expressive and subtly suggestive. That this piece could be considered porn is an absolute anathema to me, and a slap in the face to art in general. Trying to push us back into the sixties. A woman's body is beautiful, and her pleasure is incredible. It is not degrading to something to show the potential for its beauty. Does anyone else feel that Neo-Feminism is starting to flirt with all out 'slut shaming?' While intending no offence to pornographic actresses or actors, I don't think it is fair to this model to insinuate that she is part of something pornographic.
In the end I feel like people decide to allow nude images to show up in their profile, and they should therefore be prepared for the fact that sometimes those nude people will be excited and not just casually being nude in a blaze way.
Anyhow, I could go on for hours and hours. What are your thoughts? Do you feel that this type of thing is trying to pigeon hole art into a barrower scope, and thereby taking us back into more conservative times.
Okay so that line means something completely different in the song than in this journal but I feel like it is fitting. It can make you scared, but only if you want it to.
Censorship continues to creep in at the edges, it seems to be slowly and aimed mostly only at visual art, I say mostly because several of you have had written works targeted as well. I have noticed that it started with photo-manip. folks, and then spread to DID creators, and now all the way to an amazing artist who I have featured several times who creates beautiful works.
Here are his thoughts and where the subsequent discussion is at present.
This beautiful shot got him a note suggesting that he remove the image, not telling, just suggesting. So it starts out with a little old fashioned melodramatic suggestive threat, and therefore from a place of very tenuous moral standing in my opinion. I believe it was handled thus because when one looks at it, you can see how it could be interpreted that the lady is touching herself erotically, or is covering herself, she could be stifling a yawn, or a cry of ecstasy.
It is all open to interpretation, which is inherently clever on the part of both model and photographer, and that is literally what makes it art and not porn. Porn is brazen and clear and gratuitous, whereas art is expressive and subtly suggestive. That this piece could be considered porn is an absolute anathema to me, and a slap in the face to art in general. Trying to push us back into the sixties. A woman's body is beautiful, and her pleasure is incredible. It is not degrading to something to show the potential for its beauty. Does anyone else feel that Neo-Feminism is starting to flirt with all out 'slut shaming?' While intending no offence to pornographic actresses or actors, I don't think it is fair to this model to insinuate that she is part of something pornographic.
In the end I feel like people decide to allow nude images to show up in their profile, and they should therefore be prepared for the fact that sometimes those nude people will be excited and not just casually being nude in a blaze way.
Anyhow, I could go on for hours and hours. What are your thoughts? Do you feel that this type of thing is trying to pigeon hole art into a barrower scope, and thereby taking us back into more conservative times.
Ch, ch, ch, ch, ch, Changes
Hi everybody. As some of you know I will be away in the remote north for three weeks beginning Thursday, and then onto Holland for at least a week, followed by about a week in Germany. I will have limited time and internet access at some points, and so will become a little less active for the next six weeks. Don't worry or fret if you don't hear from me or see submissions, I will be back.
Speaking of limited time; It has come to my attention that I was wrong about the readership of my journal. It seems that only the featured artist and a small contingent of friends are actually reading. So I am going to downgrade it to only The Featured Arti
Theyre all for Gord, but this one's for Gord
Good Morning Everyone. I hope that everyone had a fantastic weekend. Mine was a productive one, as I began readying myself for an interesting week, and for the impending change coming into my life, impending not always being a bad thing. I also started on a new commission (2nd so far) and so I feel invigorated and prepared.
Enough time has finally passed that I can at last work on the Gord Downie Tribute piece that has been nagging me for months but has been much too hard. I have submitted what I have so far, and please be very careful about the comments on this one, as I feel the weight of the world battling me on this one already.
Meanwhi
Wow 43-1
Well I dont often wave the Olympic flag, but the Maple Leaf along with the Norwegian flags are waving very high in the Olympic Village today.
Norway and Canada sit 1st and 2nd in the metal count with a combined population of 41,000,000.
Germany, the United States, and China have a combined population of 1,785,000,000 and cannot get past either of the dominant winter nations.
In terms of population we should only get one metal for every forty three generated by the big three.
I'm also not really big on the bible, but this is certainly akin to the David and Goliath story we all know.
Sorry everyone, should have kept your eyes on the sling.
And have you felt your neck skin crawl?
I don't know why, but there is just something a little strange and creepy here this morning. Shrug. I am therefore embracing it with one of my favorite Maiden Tunes. Fear of the Dark.
I decided today that I would post a couple photos, since I have not done so in some time. The first is from one of many flights over the Rockies, and I do always catch the 'Red Eye' in hopes of seeing dusk like this.
Meanwhile, I would like to point out that there are some incredible sand sculptures at these international competitions. Check it out on google and be blown away, and take the next chance to go in person. I could stare at these things for hours, a
© 2018 - 2024 northernfly
Comments4
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Thank you for spreading my thread. We shouldn't surrender quietly!